Managing Change - Executive Coaching and Leadership Development
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Development >
      • Executive Coaching
      • Leadership Coaching & Development
      • Psychometrics and 360 Feedback
      • Programmes >
        • Leadership Development Programmes
    • Transitions >
      • Career Coaching
      • Parental Leave Coaching >
        • Maternity Coaching
        • Paternity Coaching
      • Outplacement >
        • The Programmes
    • Well-being
  • About Us
  • Our People
    • Credentials
    • Sarah Jaggers
    • Simon Foster
    • Christine Peck
    • Annabel Purves
    • Lesley Trenner
    • Roberta Bantel
    • Mark Powell
  • Our Clients
    • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • News and Views

Top Tips for Influencing at Job Interviews #4 - Understanding Psychological Bias 

1/12/2014

0 Comments

 
In the fourth and final article in our series on influencing at interviews we look at the psychological features that commonly affect interviewers and may bias them for or against a candidate. Understanding this may help you in your interview preparation.

Warning - Jargon Alert! The following article contains some... But of course you won't be using any at the interview!

Primacy and recency biases: Research indicates that interviewers tend to remember the start and end of the interview but are somewhat vague about the middle, so a strong starting and ending performance is important.

The primacy effect becomes transformed into the expectancy effect where the interviewer forms an expectation of the candidate from their application form and initial verbal and non-verbal behaviour. These early impressions strongly affect the final appointment decision.

The contrast effect indicates that the interviewer's decisions are affected by those whom they have seen before you. They pay particular attention to any information (good or bad) that is unusual or out of the ordinary.

The personal liking bias suggests that interviewers select people they like and they allow their ratings of a candidate’s ability to be affected by such liking. The greater the perceived similarity between yourself and the interviewer, the more they will interpret your behaviour as reflecting attitudes that are similar to their own.

​The interviewer’s confirmatory information-seeking bias may lead them to actively look for evidence to support their initial impression and thereby to avoid contradictory evidence.

It is important to give good explanations for any less than positive elements of your career history or CV. This is because people assume that we deserve our status, success, rank, etc. Similarly we assume that others are less fortunate because they deserve to be (“people get what they deserve”). The effect is that unless you use such explanations appropriately you will be blamed for your perceived failures. Remember that negative information about a candidate disproportionately outweighs positive information, particularly if this impression is given early in the interview.

​Many employers will seek to overcome these biases in order to be more objective and fair to candidates. They may use structured and competency based interviews, and involve two or more interviewers. This helps to reduce the impact of these biases to some degree although it should be noted that they will still be in operation.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Authentic Leadership
    Breaking Through
    Career Coaching
    Careers
    Coaching Psychology
    Communication
    CVs
    Diversity And Inclusion
    Emotional Intelligence
    Employee Engagement
    EQ
    Executive Coaching
    Feedback
    Feedback Culture
    Imposter Syndrome
    Job Interviews
    Job Search
    Lawyer Survey
    Leadership
    Leadership Development
    Leadership Development Programme Model
    Learning And Development
    Management Development
    Managing Change
    Maternity Coaching
    Meetings
    Motivation
    Parental Leave
    Performance
    Positive Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Redundancy
    Resilience
    Returning To Work
    Strengths
    Stress
    Transactional Analysis
    Women Leaders
    Working Mums

    Archives

    October 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

    RSS Feed

Picture


Managing Change (Cambridge) Limited

t: 01223 655667       e: enquiries@managingchange.org.uk

Copyright © 2016 - 2020 Managing Change (Cambridge) Limited. All Rights Reserved.

GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Development >
      • Executive Coaching
      • Leadership Coaching & Development
      • Psychometrics and 360 Feedback
      • Programmes >
        • Leadership Development Programmes
    • Transitions >
      • Career Coaching
      • Parental Leave Coaching >
        • Maternity Coaching
        • Paternity Coaching
      • Outplacement >
        • The Programmes
    • Well-being
  • About Us
  • Our People
    • Credentials
    • Sarah Jaggers
    • Simon Foster
    • Christine Peck
    • Annabel Purves
    • Lesley Trenner
    • Roberta Bantel
    • Mark Powell
  • Our Clients
    • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • News and Views